I found this article, which was quite discomforting, coming from someone more on the ECT side: http://www.ect.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/1301180a.pdf. I had not realized, though was told by my shock doctor about maintenance, that maintenance was crucial. Like most people, I thought ECT is a last resort and a one-time thing.
I don’t know whether maintenance is in order for me. If I had more sessions, I would call them continuing the treatment. Except for having felt good for about a week, I can’t tell that I benefitted from ECT. I don’t even know if the shock doctor would go ahead with more for me. I had no negative side effects either. I forget things, but I would be hard-pressed determining it’s the ECT not the depression. Anyway, what I’m trying to say is, I would define maintenance as sessions for people who had gone through a course of treatments and stopped after achieving success, not interrupting for other reasons, like me, before being able to determine an outcome.
Right now, what is going on situationally is so stressful. It is why I’m anxious, don’t sleep, snap at people, and am so despondent. I don’t like where my life is going and have a hard time thinking I am in control of taking it where I want it. There was a week, during ECT, when I thought of all those things without being phased…. Placebo? A flip into mania?
Then, there is the news, delivered by a friend, about new stricter regulations on ECT machines. The latter news will probably not stop anyone, in my opinion, from proceeding with ECT. It is clearly a logistical thing. I can see people proceeding faster than they had planned. When you want ECT, you have researched it, researched your psychiatrist, anesthesiologist, exhausted your options…… and you are very depressed. What will happen in a few years, we don’t know yet. I am sure that, in the immediate future though, the FDA regulations won’t make much difference. They certainly don’t create a legal cause of action.
Here’s one link my friend sent me:
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/04/15/with-fda-change-ect-may-go-the-way-of-the-dinosaur/
Here is another, about various devices, which would include ECT machines:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123920937438601763.html.
I wonder if anyone will lobby against these regulations. To require the manufacturers of ECT machines to document their safety but mostly efficacy is an ominous task. Really, how tricky it would be to assess whether one benefitted from ECT, to measure long-term effects when life and its millions of factors affecting well-being is going on, to isolate, in other words, the ECT impact, good or bad, from other factors, is unrealistic.
If I had to judge right now what ECT did for me, I would probably say, “very little,” whether good or bad. But I would hate for that option to be taken away from patients. I know people who have benefitted from it. I know that the psychiatrist who was giving it to me was a good man and a smart man.
ECT should remain an option.